Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

• Yaser delshad ¹
• Ali Reza Azad ²

¹ 1. PhD student of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Theology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

² 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Quranic and Hadith Sciences, Faculty of Theology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

Abstract

The generality of the subject of hermeneutics and its fundamental role in the understanding of texts pave the way for its application in various subjects, including the rules of Quranic interpretation. The practice of commentators over the centuries has included adherence to certain interpretative methods to achieve a correct understanding of the meanings of verses and the divine intent. On the other hand, the interpreter is obliged to employ scientific methods and avoid pseudo-methods like interpreting the Quran based on personal opinion (Tafsir bi-al-ra'y). This article, using a descriptive-analytical method, examines the equating of philosophical hermeneutics with Tafsir bi-al-ra'y in the field of Quranic understanding rules. After presenting nine reasons for this equating and critiquing them, it concludes that the primary reason for equating philosophical hermeneutics with Tafsir bi-al-ra'y is the incorrect understanding of philosophical hermeneutics' teachings. Based on the results obtained, not only is the application of philosophical hermeneutics in the field of Quranic understanding not equivalent to Tafsir bi-al-ra'y, but its employment also aids in a deeper understanding of the verses and an optimal comprehension of the pseudo-methods.

Keywords

• Hermeneutics
• Quranic Interpretation
• Interpretation by Opinion
• Philosophical Hermeneutics
• Basics of Interpretation

Main Subjects

• Interpretation