Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

• mansour Hosaini ¹
• Mohammad Hasan Saneipour ²
• leylasadat moraveji ³
• Rahmatull ah Abdollahzadeh ⁴

¹ Iran, the herding city of Payame Noor University

² Associate professor , group of Quranic Sciences and Hadith , Kashan , Iran

³ Assistant Professor of Islamic Teachings, Kashan University

⁴ Asiciate professor

Abstract

The science of appropriateness is one of the important issues and challenges in Quranic sciences, as this knowledge is the subject of special interest and attention of scholars in the books of interpretation and Quranic sciences. This research tries to examine the relevance of Akmal's verse in the library and analytical method of Sunni commentators, in the past and present, and analyze and compare their commonalities and differences. Although Sunni commentators have given different opinions about the structure of this verse, but considering the context of the Akmal verse (the third part of the third verse of Surah Ma'idah) and its connection with the beginning (the first part) and the bottom (the third part) of the verse, they consider it a controversial statement that It comes in the distance between the prohibitions before it and the permission after it, and there are various justifications to explain this objection. In the review of this opinion, in addition to rereading the objection category in the science of rhetoric and referring to the opinion of commentators about the dignity of the revelation of Surah Ma'idah (in Madinah and before Hajj al-Wada) and the time difference and lack of continuity of its descent with the revelation of the verse of Akmal (in ) is worthy of reflection. And after the revelation of Akmal verse and based on the general rule of the arrangement of the verses, we see the continuity of the reading and the interpretive argument indicating the continuity.

Keywords

• the science of continuity
• Sunni commentators
• verse of completion
• literary approach

Main Subjects

• Interpretation