Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

• zahra Mansouri ¹
• seied abdorasoul hosseinizadeh ²

¹ University of Sciences and Education of the Holy Quran

² Assistant Professor of the Holy Quran University of Sciences and Education

Abstract

The commentators have interpreted the Qur'an according to their own principles, some of which are common among the commentators and some are specific to one or more commentators. Ayatollah Khamenei has interpreted the Qur'an for many years with an emphasis on social issues;Sayyid Qutb also tries to show a way to create a society based on Islam by emphasizing the same tendency in the interpretation of "Fi Zalal Al-Quran". Although these two commentators have commonalities in general interpretive principles, there is a fundamental difference in how the principles are applied in their works.

The present study, in a comparative-analytical method, while pointing out the commonalities of the two commentators in the basics, talks about their different principles and bases, in order to find the differences between the interpretive views of the two in comparative comparisons and analysis. Examining the interpretations received from both commentators, it can be seen that both have similar views on the use of narrations, belief in the miracle of the Qur'an, and the use of the means of revelation, history, and manners, but there is a clear difference in how they are used and how much they are used. There is between them; In addition, they have completely different views on the authority or non-authority of the sayings of the Companions and their followers and the abrogation of the Qur'an.

Keywords

• Comparative Interpretation
• Khamenei
• Seyyed Qutb
• Fundamentals of Interpretation
• Interpretive Tendency

Main Subjects

• Interpretation